Every Man His Own Physician: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Historical Context == | == Historical Context == | ||
=== Medicine in 18th-Century England === | === Medicine in 18th-Century England === | ||
In the mid-18th Century, England was developing its medical prowess, awareness, and education. Generational knowledge of disease outbreaks, infections, and treatment was critical in these advancements. Past epidemics like the Black Death and the Great Plague of London had decimated a significant portion of the English population in the 14th and 17th Centuries, respectively. <ref name= | In the mid-18th Century, England was developing its medical prowess, awareness, and education. Generational knowledge of disease outbreaks, infections, and treatment was critical in these advancements. Past epidemics like the Black Death and the Great Plague of London had decimated a significant portion of the English population in the 14th and 17th Centuries, respectively. <ref name=”contag”>Zuckerman, Arnold. “Plague and Contagionism in Eighteenth-Century England: The Role of Richard Mead.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol. 78, no. 2, 2004, pp. 273-308, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44448005. Accessed 22 April 2023. </ref> While these events were detrimental to the lives of millions of Europeans, they also taught the surviving populations important information regarding the spread of infectious disease and its treatment. <ref name="contag"></ref> Contagion theory, the belief that some diseases could be transmitted from person to person by contact, was gaining in popularity and acceptance in the early 18th Century, yet physicians could not reach a consensus. <ref name="contag"></ref> Germ theory would not be widely accepted until the 19th Century. <ref name=”Germ”> Britannica.com. Verification of the germ theory. [online] Available at: <https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-medicine/Verification-of-the-germ-theory> [Accessed 22 April 2023]. </ref> | ||
Additionally, organized medicine was still in development. Hospitals existed throughout England but small towns often had less access to them. Instead, many small English towns and cities were serviced by privately practicing, often uncertified surgeons. Medical schools provided a rich liberal arts education and a wealth of medical knowledge to physicians but they were expensive. Uncertified surgery was a profession that was often passed through a family, and the entirety of a surgeon’s education often came from their parent’s instruction. These surgeons’ services were less expensive than trained physicians’ but their education and services were not as exceptional; many small towns still did not have access to many surgeons. Thus, small towns in 18th-century England had relatively poor medical treatment and relied on familial practices and remedies. People in large cities like London enjoyed increased access to hospitals, physicians, and surgeons. | Additionally, organized medicine was still in development. Hospitals existed throughout England but small towns often had less access to them. Instead, many small English towns and cities were serviced by privately practicing, often uncertified surgeons. Medical schools provided a rich liberal arts education and a wealth of medical knowledge to physicians but they were expensive. Uncertified surgery was a profession that was often passed through a family, and the entirety of a surgeon’s education often came from their parent’s instruction. These surgeons’ services were less expensive than trained physicians’ but their education and services were not as exceptional; many small towns still did not have access to many surgeons. Thus, small towns in 18th-century England had relatively poor medical treatment and relied on familial practices and remedies. People in large cities like London enjoyed increased access to hospitals, physicians, and surgeons. | ||
Revision as of 02:26, 23 April 2023
Overview
Historical Context
Medicine in 18th-Century England
In the mid-18th Century, England was developing its medical prowess, awareness, and education. Generational knowledge of disease outbreaks, infections, and treatment was critical in these advancements. Past epidemics like the Black Death and the Great Plague of London had decimated a significant portion of the English population in the 14th and 17th Centuries, respectively. [1] While these events were detrimental to the lives of millions of Europeans, they also taught the surviving populations important information regarding the spread of infectious disease and its treatment. [2] Contagion theory, the belief that some diseases could be transmitted from person to person by contact, was gaining in popularity and acceptance in the early 18th Century, yet physicians could not reach a consensus. [2] Germ theory would not be widely accepted until the 19th Century. [3]
Additionally, organized medicine was still in development. Hospitals existed throughout England but small towns often had less access to them. Instead, many small English towns and cities were serviced by privately practicing, often uncertified surgeons. Medical schools provided a rich liberal arts education and a wealth of medical knowledge to physicians but they were expensive. Uncertified surgery was a profession that was often passed through a family, and the entirety of a surgeon’s education often came from their parent’s instruction. These surgeons’ services were less expensive than trained physicians’ but their education and services were not as exceptional; many small towns still did not have access to many surgeons. Thus, small towns in 18th-century England had relatively poor medical treatment and relied on familial practices and remedies. People in large cities like London enjoyed increased access to hospitals, physicians, and surgeons.
History of Medical Recipe Books
Understanding Every Man His Own Physician
Physical Manipulation, Editing, and Book Use
References
- ↑ Zuckerman, Arnold. “Plague and Contagionism in Eighteenth-Century England: The Role of Richard Mead.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol. 78, no. 2, 2004, pp. 273-308, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44448005. Accessed 22 April 2023.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedcontag - ↑ Britannica.com. Verification of the germ theory. [online] Available at: <https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-medicine/Verification-of-the-germ-theory> [Accessed 22 April 2023].